The glory days of Epic Games are long gone and Tim Sweeney is a god damn moron.

  • other_cat@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Headlines where I have to remind myself not to downvote the OP for sharing news even when I despise the person being reported on.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember seeing a joke once about what if Reddit added left votes and right votes with no explanation in addition to up votes and down votes.

  • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s not wrong about the main point, but I think it just means you need to be clearer about the AI disclosure. Was this AI generated images, text, or voices? Was the codebase just using small amounts of AI tab completion or substantial portions of AI generated code?

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s nuance. Don’t make the MBA decision maker’s heads explode.

  • npcknapsack@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not surprised. People thought he was a good guy because he sued Apple and Google, but he did it for his own profit, not for the principle. And now he wants AI slop games for his own profit, too.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Him not ordering support for Fortnite on Linux says it all about how serious he actually is about wanting to escape OS ecosystems like Apple, Google, and Windows. He doesn’t care about alternatives.

      His only goal is getting more profit, since when it comes to supporting movements that would help Linux grow that might allow him to not be at the mercy of other corporations he chooses to do nothing. As long as he makes profit he is happy to be on copilot riddled Windows and spyware Google Android. He considers Linux a waste of money to put resources towards.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Waaaahhhh! Waaaaahhhh! Why is Steam such a good service? That should be illegal! Tell them they should be worse!”

    That’s all I’m hearing from these other corpos.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    They can skip the AI label and get down to brass tacks with a “this game sucks” label.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Sweeney has Steam living rent free in his head. Whining about Monopoly

    Meanwhile, Epic Games already has something resembling a monopoly with the unreal engine, its buggy and resource hungry as fuck, and just seems to be getting worse. Necessitating an arms race of computer upgrades just to run the newest games on their obtuse engine thats being used for everything now. Epic certainly isnt doing anything about it. Its just a money printer for Tim’s legal battles.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      re: unreal - and unity - have stopped caring about devs and just chase new tech like nanite or new advertising shite.

      godot ftw, they’ll never come back and say “hey we’re changing the contract now you gotta pay for every install” or “hey everything is AI now”.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Go ahead and remove it Tim, I already don’t spend money on your platform and I will just continue that.

    The closest I’ve come is when I bought Alan Wake 2 on my PS5.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    If that actually happens and the label becomes redundant, then we can talk about removing it.

    Or better, inverting it to a “No AI” label for the people like me who will still care.

    Tech bros always act like this : they don’t want to actually win by making a good solution. Instead they try to make you feel like their solution is inevitable and they have already won…

    For a group of people who claim to be all about meritocracy and the “marketplace of ideas”, they sure like to short circuit those whenever possible…

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    It does make sense, because I’ll boycott nearly all future productions.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sounds like Epic needs to try to make a online game store to compete with Steam, but filled with AI slopware.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    257
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Valve revolutionized Linux gaming; Tim categorically rejects it.
    Valve banned shitcoins and blockchain scams; Tim welcomed them with open arms.
    Valve enforces honesty regarding AI slop; Tim wants to literally deceive people.
    All that on top of what they did with third-party exclusives.

    He’s like that annoying kid who didn’t get invited to a birthday party and vowed to always do the opposite of what the popular kid does. Petulant fucking overgrown child.

    • dukemirage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Valve banned shitcoins and blockchain scams

      would’ve been nice if they banned gambling, too, but that’s part of their business model unfortunately.

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I hear people say this sometimes, but I don’t know what they mean. Is there part of Valve’s system that has a gambling mechanic I’ve just never engaged with?

        Or is it one of their games that has gambling?

        Because I’ve been using it for years as basically my sole gaming interface and haven’t seen any gambling.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          51
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The short version is that an enormous, multibillion dollar gambling industry has been built around Valve’s item marketplace, and in particular around CS:GO skins. If that sounds completely insane and stupid, I’m with you, but it exists. Valve takes their typical cut off of all of these trades, and thus derives massive profits from it.

          Here’s the long version: https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz/videos/watch/a8e6d20c-3003-4b14-b9c4-cb6a25b238e7?isPeertubeContent=1

        • Kevin@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          Mainly Team Fortress 2 and Counter Strike GO/2, cuz both of them have cosmetics with rarities obtained via what effectively amounts to lootboxes. In one sense they also have an out-of-game economy around these things where these items are traded for actual money

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There is a massive secondary market for in-game items (primarily CS skins) that Valve refuses to combat or even officially acknowledge. Some of it is legitimate, some of it is literal lottery for children. And since every transaction takes place on Steam, they get a cut of that.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        At least the shit is all cosmetic not like EA sports games with their UT packs I guess. Low bar.

        • dukemirage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It might be cosmetic, but it can be sold, which fuels the addiction mechanic. EA is bad, too, but this whataboutism.

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I think difference is EA is more a game company so people see a game they like then judge the monetization because its a full priced game that turns out to have f2p monetization.

            But, Valve is more judged for its experience as a launcher and less for its games. So with the launcher itself being the draw things like Valve game lootboxes can be something people are completely unexposed to as they play other games.

            But, EA is still at a stage where the products that receive the most visibility are their games, and the launcher and services side so underwhelming it isn’t a selling point.

            Its like Costco versus a company known for its pizza. Costco is a warehouse store people love going to that happens to sell pizza, but is judged on multiple things that draw them there over other stores as opposed to pizza. A pizza company is just known primarily for its pizza so judged on the quality of their pizza.

            • dukemirage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              The launcher?! This bloatware is the second worst thing about Valve’s services right after the gamble mechanics.

              • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Gambling mechanic is as impactful to me as Costco selling alcohol and junk food. I don’t play those games, so only reason I’m even aware of it is because of people bringing it up. Those who seek it out can get it those who come for other things can avoid it.

                And I like the steam launcher when it comes to linux compatibility, steam workshop, reviews, categorizing my games, note function, and gamepad support. I absolutely would not want to go back to the old days of CDs for games. Too many to manage and keep track of. And I like my Steam Deck for introducing me to Linux gaming, and being one of the few launchers that actually has Linux support and doesn’t need to rely on third party work arounds.

                Those who don’t value that can buy from Epic or other launchers the way some people don’t see the difference buying from Costco vs Walmart and see membership fees as a waste of money. Or go over to consoles to be free of launchers entirely.

                I’d say the only thing that bothers me about Steam is that you can’t completely ignore updates for games, so have to go into offline mode or save a copy then update then replace the directory or use steam console to retrieve the old version if you accidentally updated. That’s been my only gripe as a Steam user for games like Skyrim where I don’t want updates.

                • dukemirage@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t want to discredit Steam’s features like compatibility layers, but the software itself is a mess. It is an unnessecary RAM-heavy chromium instance, to be fair, just like most other launchers. I replaced it with Playnite which is streamlined, responsive and more feature rich for managing a library (Steam still needs to be installed of course because they don’t offer offline installer like GOG). And I’d argue that console user saren’t free of launcher, they are locked into a very specific one.

                  But as someone who’s neither been to Costco nor Walmart, what is the difference?

    • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tim’s strategy seems to be “Whatever Valve drops, we take because we feel Valve is missing out on something BIG! It’ll make US look great!”

      And while the sad truth of the matter could very well be a maybe, depending on how the pure-epic userbase are over there towards it, it still pales to everything Steam has been built to be.