With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

    • urshanabi [he/they]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I want to add, it also take a while to get it going and the upfront costs are several billions of dollars. There also needs to be some kind of training or something to get the right personnel.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        And it’s a long project that will span multiple administrations, leading to low certainty of project completion. As long as it’s a political wedge issue the support can’t be relied upon throughout the project.

      • SquareBear@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m looking forward to seeing your Instagram snaps once you move back to pripyat permanently. Statistics never tell the full story.

      • riley0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you’re referring to the nukes-are-statistically-safe argument, then to be fair, you also have to take into account the scale of their failures.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Right it would be something involving number of people harmed, for number of joules or watt-hours of energy produced. How much injury, death, etc is there on a per-unit basis. That would be how you’d get a probability of harm. Then you could compare it numerically with other forms of energy to see which is the safest, statistically speaking.