Did you forget the funny?
wut?
Likely in reference to Zohran’s endorsement of Zionist Brad Landers in his attempt to primary Dan Goldman in NYC.
What’s Lina Kahn have to do with that?
Also, While Landers and Goldman are both self professed zionests, Landers endorsed Mamdani and Goldman did not, and Landers has aligned himself with progressives, so working with Landers on common goals seems more likely.
I hope OP responds to clarify, but thank you for your theory of their cereal box.
People are upset because Zohran ran with anti-zionism as a primary part of his campaign and he has seemingly not stayed the course there.
I’m also unsure what the rest of his transition team has to do with the whole thing and it feels like some of them are catching strays here lol
Mamdani is nothing but another fake leftist plant to destroy the actual workers movement, wouldn’t surprise me if the CIA was behind it (again) LMBO
If you peep janks profile it’s all posts pushing “Russia’s” narratives
Yeah, sorry forgot libs really love that empire
propagandanarrative dont want to see whats really happening and all LMBOHappy to hear alternative narratives but consider myself skeptical of favouring the aggressors propaganda… share an equally skeptical view of what motivates most “western” democracies there is plenty of greed to go around lol but go off king 😂
