• AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    It does not surprise me that the Air is literally the folding phone without the second screen.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It slightly does me, given that the Air was (apparently) a huge commercial flop. You’d think they’d revisit the soundly mocked design instead of recycling it, or at least change it? The renders may very well be overstating it, of course, but still it’s an odd feature to carry over.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was a flop because no one really wants thinner phones, they are harder to use. The iPhone Air was also extremely overpriced and missing basic features a phone a quarter of the price has.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes, those are all great points that make up a good portion of why they should probably revisit the design.

          • village604
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Or maybe stop trying to make expensive electronics as thin as possible.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thin is fine. But you should use that newly free space for a bigger battery. It fits better in people’s hands that way too.

              • village604
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Exactly, and it’s easier to make them user serviceable that way too.

                I’ve never understood the desire to make $1k+ electronics super thin, but then again I step on things a lot. I guess the fragility could be a form of planned obsolescence.