This is ambiguous because in other, simpler contexts, implicit multiplication is implied to take priority over non-implicit division. And that’s just usual convention, not a set rule.
If I write 1/2n, most likely it will be understood as 1/(2×n). While 1/2×n or 1÷2×n would be anyone’s guess. Again, 1/2n is not even a rule, just “convenient” and it “seems” like 2n is a block, but make that expression more complex with more operands and it’ll get confusing fast.
There is no correct interpretation of a random ambiguous expression, it’s pointless trying to find one.
Because there are no parentheses around the first and last two, it should be assumed to be the latter, yeah?
I arrived at 1 prior to trying to understand how it could be 16…
As written, 8÷2… Is the same as 8/2… It would require those brackets/parentheses otherwise.
This is ambiguous because in other, simpler contexts, implicit multiplication is implied to take priority over non-implicit division. And that’s just usual convention, not a set rule.
If I write 1/2n, most likely it will be understood as 1/(2×n). While 1/2×n or 1÷2×n would be anyone’s guess. Again, 1/2n is not even a rule, just “convenient” and it “seems” like 2n is a block, but make that expression more complex with more operands and it’ll get confusing fast.
There is no correct interpretation of a random ambiguous expression, it’s pointless trying to find one.