• village604
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Kinda, but with encryption you know it’s encrypted. With this you don’t know what data is real and what’s fair fake.

      • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Good point yeah. We want to poison the damn things. Which is fun.

        Reminds me of steganography, still.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    20 days ago

    “Theft”? Are they afraid robots are going to break into their buildings and start stealing stuff‽

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Theft is something that happens to physical things. What’s actually happening is “copying”.

        The MPAA/RIAA made the “copying is theft” argument over and over again in the 90s and early 2000s. It was wrong then and it’s wrong now.

        • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Aha, now I see your point. Could I just borrow your bank login details? If you have some digital current in there, I’d like to copy it.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Bank account details are a form of credentials. If I gave them to you, I’d also still have them.

            If you took the money out of my account, that’s theft though. Because the account is a digital way of holding something physical (money). It’s a mechanism of exchange, not data in and of itself.

            Besides, money isn’t real anyway!