Maga would support it because most Maga are pedos anyway. There’s always some Maga pastor etc in the news each week for molesting kids or having a computer full of CSAM.
WTF are you smoking? Just because I didn’t mention Epstein means I’m deflecting? Yeah Epstein and his friends are also pedos. Just like plenty of MAGA. What’s your point?
I was replying to a comment that was specifically about how MAGA would react. My reply was therefore about the topic in question, i.e. MAGA and their reaction. There was no real reason to bring up other groups of people at that point. You don’t seem to understand how conversations generally work. Also now that I’ve already agreed that Epstein etc are also pedos, you still accuse me of somehow deflecting about that. You’re clearly the delusional one.
Maga would support it because most Maga are pedos anyway. There’s always some Maga pastor etc in the news each week for molesting kids or having a computer full of CSAM.
weekdayHave you heard of The Epstein files?
It appears that a ton of his pedophile friends weren’t MAGA, and were in fact the wealthiest of “the left” and “the right”.
Why do you want to pretend otherwise? Deflection, probably.
WTF are you smoking? Just because I didn’t mention Epstein means I’m deflecting? Yeah Epstein and his friends are also pedos. Just like plenty of MAGA. What’s your point?
What drugs are YOU snorting??? I wish you would share, I want to be that oblivious
You have two groups of people. They both include a lot of pedophiles
Why mention only one, when it’s both?
Oh! I know why! You’re deflecting
I was replying to a comment that was specifically about how MAGA would react. My reply was therefore about the topic in question, i.e. MAGA and their reaction. There was no real reason to bring up other groups of people at that point. You don’t seem to understand how conversations generally work. Also now that I’ve already agreed that Epstein etc are also pedos, you still accuse me of somehow deflecting about that. You’re clearly the delusional one.