This makes perfect sense to me. The boss is saying that you didn’t learn anything in college that you’ll use in this job, but your participation in college is what proves you’ll be a good little work rat.
I remember this one business guy sitting next to me on a plane, pretty much told me that when I was younger. He said a degree just proves to them you’re trained to do what they say.
“I see here you didn’t list a degree, did you forget to add yours?”.
“I actually don’t have one, I figured my 16 years of software engineering experience at 3 different fortune 100 companies would count as experience in lieu.”
“…well we really wanted that degree, so unfortunately…”
My bachelor became obsolete a few years after i finished and couldnt put it on my resume anymore - still had to pay the student debt though
I was asked to review my own job description. “Must have relevant degree”. Me, awkwardly, can we update that to “Relevant degree would be a bonus”?
Not sure if serious or joking
It depends on the company.
I have an AP degree in Computer Science (Academic Profession - it’s a 2+0.5 year degree in Denmark that serves as a basis for a BSc specialisation, basically allowing you to “top it up” to multiple full BSc’s if you want to, e.g. in my case I could’ve gone on for sysadmin, database engineering, and software engineering BSc’s, each taking a year + 4-6 months of internship), and even with a decade+ of experience working for companies of all sizes, I often get rejected because not having a full Bachelors.
And it’s often a weird leadership thing. A few years back I interviewed for a company, and hit it off with the tech lead of the team I would’ve been joining. The whole process was smooth, the team liked me, and vocally preferred me over other candidates. But the CTO - who was the last interview round - opted for a candidate with lesser skills, because he had a BSc from a university the CTO knew (or was somehow involved with, I don’t know the specifics). They ended up firing him within half a year, and to date the tech lead tells me how much better things would’ve been if the C-suite wasn’t so blinded by a flashy diploma.
Meanwhile most places don’t give a damn. If you have experience, and/or a good CV, and can prove yourself in the technical challenge part of the interview, it doesn’t matter if you have a PhD or if you walked in from the street with a high school diploma. What matters is what you can do and deliver.
Canonical (the company behind Ubuntu) asks for high school transcripts, so this is believable
I often hear that it’s not what you learned in college but rather that you have proven that you can regularly come sit in a place for hours for an extended amount of time out of your own free will.
Except for the 1/4 of my classes that I skipped and still passed
Yup. Can you be a slave?
It’s more your ability to learn. I will probably never need to make my own linked list but learning how to taught me what pointers are.
Lol as a drop out I thought linked list and binary sort were the apex of programming and useful in all context.
I think a lot of it is well roundedness and a good foundation for the later practical applications.
I learned basically no practical knowledge with my IT bachelors. But every IT class of my associates degree was a certification prep course.
Tbf, two year programs are great for specific careers.
ehh, even people that retain literally nothing can get through college to get a paper
Lol, lmao even. Depends on the major and the university/college 😂
Maybe YOUR college
It’s surprisingly an issue when getting workers through an agency
The ol’ Catch-22 of the working world.
