buckykat [none/use name] to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 2 months agoUsb-C and its overengineered history By Tempo on Vrchatwww.youtube.commessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down10
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkUsb-C and its overengineered history By Tempo on Vrchatwww.youtube.combuckykat [none/use name] to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarebuh [she/her, any]linkfedilinkEnglish10•2 months agoI’m so insulted, a proper USB-C cable needs at least 40kB flash, but a few years ago I had to make firmware for something with less than 1kB
minus-squarebuh [she/her, any]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoUSB-C is like if someone was trans in a transmedicalist way
minus-squarebuh [she/her, any]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 months agoyou know how retvrn guys are willing to churn butter or whatever even though it sucks? I think this video made like that but for USB 2.0
minus-squarebuckykat [none/use name]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months ago80 fucking components on each device for a fully spec compliant 3.2 gen 2 port
I’m so insulted, a proper USB-C cable needs at least 40kB flash, but a few years ago I had to make firmware for something with less than 1kB
USB-C is like if someone was trans in a transmedicalist way
you know how retvrn guys are willing to churn butter or whatever even though it sucks? I think this video made like that but for USB 2.0
80 fucking components on each device for a fully spec compliant 3.2 gen 2 port