Nobody is asking them to not protect the victims, people are demanding the names and identities of the people that were corresponding with Epstein. All of them. You’re being hyperbolic and reactionary.
Learn to apply context and situational reasoning. Random commenters aren’t lawyers and judges, you know exactly what is being asked for, stop being obtuse.
While the victims need to be protected, that’s not what Trump and the DOJ did. Rather than out the perpetrators and protect the victims, they outed the victims and are protecting the perpetrators. All because the people protecting the perpetrators, the perpetrators, and the officials in charge of this are all the same people. So yeah they already crossed that bridge backwards without shoes.
If they released the full, unredacted files they’d be distributing CSAM and victim names, though. Some redacting is necessary.
I’d agree but they already did that. They seemed to have spent far more care and attention protecting the rapists than the rapees.
Them already releasing CSAM is a bad justification to release more CSAM.
Nobody is asking them to not protect the victims, people are demanding the names and identities of the people that were corresponding with Epstein. All of them. You’re being hyperbolic and reactionary.
What exactly do you think “full unredacted” means? Words have meaning.
Learn to apply context and situational reasoning. Random commenters aren’t lawyers and judges, you know exactly what is being asked for, stop being obtuse.
While the victims need to be protected, that’s not what Trump and the DOJ did. Rather than out the perpetrators and protect the victims, they outed the victims and are protecting the perpetrators. All because the people protecting the perpetrators, the perpetrators, and the officials in charge of this are all the same people. So yeah they already crossed that bridge backwards without shoes.
So the solution to that is to release all of the CSAM?
Redaction needs to happen, but it needs to be done by an independent organization.