stenAanden@feddit.dk to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前The planets of the solar systemfeddit.dkimagemessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down110
arrow-up1756arrow-down1imageThe planets of the solar systemfeddit.dkstenAanden@feddit.dk to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square63linkfedilink
minus-squarevillage604linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前If you’ve ever driven across Texas, it definitely feels that way. It can take over 12h.
minus-squareosanna@lemmy.vglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前that’s nothing. I can drive in my state in one direction for 20 hours and STILL be in the state. it can fit texas at least 3-4 times in it.
minus-squarevillage604linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Alaska most likely. Texas is about 3.75x bigger than Washington State.
minus-squarerockman057@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前I think they meant Western Australia.
minus-squarevillage604linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 个月前Assuming Alaska, it’s closer to 2.5x, although Texas has more habitable land.
minus-squareShitbrains@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前I was assuming CA. The one direction being only North or South, depending on where you start…
minus-squarevillage604linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前CA is about half the area of Texas. Another person suggested West Australia which tracks.
If you’ve ever driven across Texas, it definitely feels that way. It can take over 12h.
that’s nothing. I can drive in my state in one direction for 20 hours and STILL be in the state. it can fit texas at least 3-4 times in it.
WA?
Yup
Alaska most likely. Texas is about 3.75x bigger than Washington State.
I think they meant Western Australia.
Classic American defaultism
Assuming Alaska, it’s closer to 2.5x, although Texas has more habitable land.
I was assuming CA. The one direction being only North or South, depending on where you start…
CA is about half the area of Texas. Another person suggested West Australia which tracks.