But lets see the Positive side: Now the Nazis wont have to burn thousands of books, saving tons of co2 in their Plan to take over the world with propaganda. So, yay for the envoirment I guess

  • @JOMusic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you’re into audiobooks, I strongly recommend libro.fm instead - it’s all DRM free downloads, so you never lose access.

    • @Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 months ago

      And here’s a reminder that if you run a Plex server, there’s an app called Prologue which turns it into a fully fledged audiobook server.

      Plex doesn’t natively support things like audiobook bookmarks in m4b files, and tries to just play them straight through like a gigantic 4 hour long music track. But Prologue does support bookmark data. Prologue simply uses Plex’s service to access the files, (because admittedly, Plex is good for letting newbies remotely access their content) and then it ignores Plex’s built-in “lol just play it like music” instructions, and actually parses the files for bookmark data.

      As someone who couldn’t get Audiobookshelf to work properly, (something about not being able to access network drives via Docker), Prologue has saved my audiobook library by allowing me to just host it via Plex instead.

        • @Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 months ago

          Yeah, I tired Audiobookshelf and gave up after fighting with it for a day or two. It refused to read or write any data on my NAS, so it couldn’t actually save/load any audiobook files.

          • @VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Rather annoying. You would think that it shouldn’t make a difference whether or not a mounted drive is present in the machine. I run everything I host in containers on a single machine, so I can’t say whether I’d have encountered such issues.

    • @localme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Also downpour.com! I ditched Audible a long time back in favor of sites like these that don’t lock authors into crappy exclusives, provide DRM-free audiobooks for sale, and have actually decent deals with authors.

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Thank you for this! I made an account and may get the membership!

    • @Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      At the very least back up your Audible library in a DRM free format with something like Libation.

      I am still using Audible because their web player works in my restricted office, and the authors get a couple of pennies from dragon, but have my library safely exported to ensure continued access and prevent fuckery like this.

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Do you have a friend code we could put in if we do sign up for libro.fm? I don’t mind getting people free stuff for recommending awesome products!

        • Ænima
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          I decided to do the subscription today so you should see at least one referral coming your way. Thanks, again, for the suggestion!

          • @JOMusic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Appreciate it! The last audiobook I picked up from Libro is Kara Swisher’s “Burn Book”. Not sure if it’s your thing, but was totally worth it for understanding more personal context around the big Tech CEOs from the last 25 years.

            • Ænima
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              Always down for a good recommendation. I picked up Black Pill. To start.

  • @Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    814 months ago

    It’s kinda odd that all these years later, you’re still better off pirating than paying for anything digital. All these services solved piracy but we’ve now gone full circle.

    • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Piracy was, is and remains a service problem, as Gabe Newell of Valve (Steam) once stated. Most people are perfectly content to pay a reasonable price to get access to the things they want. But if you make that impossible, they’ll find other options.

      Take anime for example: even if you subscribed to every streaming service out there, you still wouldn’t be able to see everything you wanted. Some things aren’t streamable or sold ANYWHERE, or only on a service that’s actively blocked in your region. Which means there is simply no legal way for you at all to get that content.

      Music on the other hand solved that dilemma. You can use Spotify, YT Music, Apple Music or a host of other options. You pay a flat fee and you can listen to pretty much every song you want, as often as you want. Nobody’s pirating MP3’s these days, because nobody needs to. It’s now more convenient to just stream it.

      I’d really like to see someone do the same for books. An unlimited digital library that lets you download anything you want for a flat subscription fee. I’d pay 10 bucks a month for that for sure. Because that would make it more convenient than pirating is right now, with a more consistent experience.

      • @ellisk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        194 months ago

        Music is definitely not a solved problem. About 30% of my favorite older tunes aren’t available on streaming at all, as I discovered when I tried to find a way to casually share with some friends.

        • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          Sure, no platform will have everything. But for me personally, on YouTube Music, I’ve always been able to find what I was looking for. But I’m admittedly not what you’d call a music aficionado.

          • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            74 months ago

            Interestingly, I am now going through some album series that are not on Youtube, but are on Spotify. It is frustrating because I can’t use Spotify on my phone (browser is incompatible), but I can Youtube, so music discovery is desktop-only. Good thing all of them are on Soulseek, though.

          • Liquidthex
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            There’s a problem with this “give them what they want and they won’t pirate” when it comes to Spotify, yt music, etc: They can change the terms at any moment. AKA enshittification.

            If you downloaded it or bought a CD? Ain’t no enshittification.

            • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              You’re absolutely right in that it’s a risk.

              But you can always buy a CD or digital album and rip the DRM off it. Or pirate it. Assuming you care enough to do that anyways.

              Me, I’m not really a music fan. Only reason I have YT Music is because it’s included with YT Premium. So it’s not going to bother me much if certain songs or albums disappear. I’ll just listen to other stuff. Music is merely background noise to me.

        • @tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          They also treat artists like shit. I switched over to Tidal simply to get access to Joanna Newsom’s music, as she won’t tolerate Spotify’s terms. Tidal isn’t much better, but it is slightly.

          I was looking forward to blockchain cutting out the middle man in paying artists. Too bad it has so far not happened that way.

        • @tomkatt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Music is easily solved.

          • Qobuz store
          • Bandcamp
          • 7Digital
          • Tidal media downloader
          • Deemix

          Screw streaming. Local is always better. Purchase and/or download FLAC. I’ve got nearly 1 TB of music on my NAS and my collection is regularly growing. From Qobuz and Bandcamp, anything you purchase is owned, and DRM free.


          Edit - though for me as a Linux user, Qobuz has actually turned this from something perfect into a service issue. Used to be able to just download a tar of your album from them after purchase. Now you have to use their (Windows only) application downloader, or individually download each track as a single download. It’s fucking irritating. I don’t buy from them now because of it. That said, they can’t edit or alter anything I’ve previously bought and stored locally.

        • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          84 months ago

          Yes, a lot of them do. But their digital selection often is pretty limited and comes with restrictions.

          For example: our Dutch national online library lets you ‘borrow’ 10 e-books at a time. You get 21 days to read a book, but you can extend that one time by another three weeks. After that, you have to ‘return’ and ‘check them out again’ if you want to continue reading. With my particular reading habits, that’s a hassle and wouldn’t work for me.

          But the biggest issue is: they only offer a limited selection. Basically, NONE of the books I’m reading now are available through that system.

          I want to be able to read every book I want, no time restriction. And that’s not possible with the current digital library system they offer.

          • Balder
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Like… if the book is digital, why do you have to borrow and return? This makes no sense. They want to replicate a bad experience that doesn’t need to exist, what’s the point of that?

            • @Hazor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              Pleasing the copyright holders. I don’t know how it is for the Dutch national library, but with a system used by many libraries in the US there’s a cost to the library based on the number of times it’s checked out, so more revenue for the copyright holder and the digital middle man. Allowing you to have the e-book indefinitely would be, at least in their minds, no different than giving it away. 🤷

              • Balder
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                This could be solved in other ways. For example, the software can simply track what % of the books are actually read without this extra step of borrowing and returning. Just like when you listen to music on streaming services.

                Imagine if you had to select the specific album in a streaming service and choose to borrow it for x days, having to “return” it and borrow again if you wanted to keep listening, and being limited to 4 albums at a time.

                • @tamal3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  Good point in pointing out the discrepancy between music streaming and book borrowing. Online libraries in the US are managed by some kind of digital rights software, which seems to essentially allow libraries to own a limited number of digital copies of a book. Streaming services like Tidal and Spotify seem to pay out a tiny amount of money to artists each time content is streamed. Is it something about library budgeting that doesn’t allow for this? Is it just historical baggage that hasn’t been rethought?

                  The music streaming model is honestly terrible for musical artists, so I’m not saying that’s necessarily the direction we should head. But you’re right that I’m not limited to listening to a song just because someone else is, and it would be extremely helpful if the same applied to library books.

                  As it is, when I have time to read I put in the request to borrow a book, and then it becomes available 1 to 10 weeks later (whether or not I’m ready to read it at that point). Then I only get 2-3 weeks to fit reading it into my schedule. It doesn’t work out half the time as I get busy with other things… So how is it not easier to pirate it or buy it? I love and support my library, but golly this digital system is dysfunctional.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Most people are perfectly content to pay a reasonable price to get access to the things they want. But if you make that impossible, they’ll find other options.

        That’s a sliding scale, though. Streaming comes at a fixed price.

        • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I am aware of them, yes. It’s not the book download site that I use personally, but you can never have enough options.

            • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 months ago

              I usually use Anna’s Archive or Lib Gen, depending on what’s actually up and working. Anna scrapes Zlib as well as other sources. Usually that’s where I can find the really obscure stuff.

      • @Swarfega@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        WB/Discovery+ just screwed people in the UK for watching cycling. It was £7 a month to watch before, which I was happy to pay. They just put an end to that and now bundled the cycling with their premium sports service for £29. I’m not paying all that when I only want cycling and none of their other content.

        I cancelled my subscription, asked them to delete my account, purchased a fire stick and now paying for some dodgy IPTV service to watch it there for a fraction of the price.

      • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        An unlimited digital library that lets you download anything you want for a flat subscription fee.

        A library? We solved that centuries ago.

        • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Except a physical library can only hold so many books, they don’t have most of the books I want and you need to return them. A physical library is not useful to me.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, about service problems and Steam - I understand why it happened, but sanctions on Russia causing my inability to not buy, but even find in store some games kinda affect it. One small nuance is that family members of those, well, making decisions in Russia are often in the western countries feeling themselves very well (including Steam games), and those who are not do not, I think, have problems dealing with this. And, btw, topping up your Steam wallet is possible, just via intermediaries with some additional expense.

        OK, this is not about Steam, this is about sanctions efficiency.

        EDIT: On the subject - I pirate MP3’s. I like having my music stored locally and not dependent on various services. I may start some day using some of those services, probably.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    524 months ago

    A hosting provider always has the ability to change what’s on their infrastructure. The Kindle store is no different.

    As it happens, they’ve been doing this for years. For example, the price you set as an author is not fixed nor is how it turns up on the page or how and when it’s promoted.

    The standard ebook format is essentially a zipped up series of text files.

    Source: I sell my “Foundations of Amateur Radio” ebooks on the Kindle store

    • LuffyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Its just a bitter taste, thinking about how a few companies can lay words into the mouth of people they did not even say, years after they died

      I would rather just have them Ban the books, because then you can see how they are manipulating the information you see.

      • Gormadt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 months ago

        Hell, I’m surprised the publishers aren’t up in arms about it.

        Amazon is changing copyrighted works.

    • @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      204 months ago

      Does Amazon have permission to change what’s in your book though?

      Copyright prevents them from making derivative works and if they change your text without your permission, that’s a clear copyright violation.

      I don’t know how licensing deals work with Amazon but I’m guessing if they are doing this en mass, there is probably some provision in their contract.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        The bigger question is do they care. At worst they get a slap on the wrist by the US government. At best they get to control the narrative and have books like having history books on their platform talk about how the the Allies first striked Nazi Germany because they were lifting the country out of economic crisis and making the world a better place.

        I doubt they’ll care or listen if EU says stop since they’ll just find a way around whatever they have planned to try and stop revisionist ideology from taking hold.

    • @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      Source: I sell my “Foundations of Amateur Radio” ebooks on the Kindle store

      And thank you for the reminder that I should go get a license before the entire system is so messed up that it wouldn’t be possible.

      Well or it would be irrelevant because no one would care.

      Either way!

  • @lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    364 months ago

    I paid for (the license to view) the books already, so I’m getting epubs from z-library without the slightest bit of moral pain.

    I could do the calibre decryption thing, but meh.

    • Singletona082
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 months ago

      Same boat man. ‘OK I’ll throw a few schmeckles in because the author does need the compensation, but i’m getting the actual book elsewhere.’

      • @flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        If I ever embrace my fate as a lonely housewife book author, I’m going to have a rough time, because the kind of people who would forever love me for producing my books and sharing them as free (with the option to donate) and the kind of people who buy lonely housewife books are two completely different circles and I wouldn’t be able to spend all the time necessary to ‘market’ myself online to get the books in the hands of people who want them, if I’m trying to spend that time writing.

        Maybe what we need is an apparatus. A website where authors can share full-size books, users can vote on them, and if you like them enough you can give money to those writers.

        I just don’t know how we’d get that, be able to allow any author to share their book, and still have quality control.

          • Helluh
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            I bought a kobo recently (for the color screen) and have had to keep going back to my kindle to read smutty romance. All their newest decisions made me cancel my KU sub, and this has saved me from what I thought would be a drought.

    • @flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      I haven’t looked at or held or otherwise directly perceived a kindle in many years now, but when I did it was insanely easy to just pop any old file into a converter and slip that onto the kindle and pirate and read as you like. Did they put a stop to that with some proprietary nonsense?

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 months ago

      Mr Stallman needs to be considered from all sides before deciding whether you’ll follow his lead. He’s not without some toejam.

  • @yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Is there a way to donate to the authors? Because I think pirating and then donating the money (directly) to the author is much more ethical than putting a megacorp or a publisher in between

    Even better if you send it with something like Monero which doesn’t even put the bank between you and the author

    • @Valmond@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      You mean the authors would actually earn money instead of the “publisher”? How unfair! /s

      When mist books were made of paper, the publishers job was quite the deal including printing, delivering, stocks, pulp the rests etc. So they took the lions share of the price together with the bookstore and the author got maybe 10-15% from the final price.

      Today it’s just theft.

  • @MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It would be nice if that stuff worked more like git where yeah maybe the release version gets changed but you can always work back through the history to see earlier versions.

    Not git specifically but just deltas from one version to the next instead of replacing the whole thing with a flattened text.

    • LuffyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      314 months ago

      Yes, but you say it like the Author himself changed it.

      In the specific Example, the book is from before 2000 and the author is long dead. That book is a piece of culture now, displaying the writing style from a place in time where it was normal to discriminate against people. By changing a book, regardless of if it was actually amazon or just some manager that bought up the rights for the book, it is manipulating the Past. Amazon should not allow to do such things

      • @MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        Oh I didn’t think I implied that at all. Certainly didn’t mean to. I was just commenting that making cultural artifacts that can be revised into delta-based distributions instead of flat is useful for many reasons. But it’s no benefit to the corps and most users don’t care so of course it won’t happen.

        • LuffyOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          OK, tanks for clarifying that

          Yes, it would be great.

  • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    274 months ago

    13+ years ago when I’d say why I hate social media, cloud services, all this convenient dependence, everybody would act as if this was stupid.

    My logic was that if there’s a mechanism allowing such influence, no matter how small, its power will grow almost until the death of such an ecosystem. Because the returns of abusing it will always be more than the expenses.

    I don’t like this Cassandra feeling really.

  • @Tea_and_oranges@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 months ago

    The man who made that video is annoying. The story he read out was from the twits by Roald dahl, it was a few years back that those changes were made. Dahl was a great author but wasn’t a very pc person , his family have had to apologise for his anti semitism. So whoever is in charge of his works wanted to make them more modern and less insulting which misses the point of Dahl but anyway. They’ve done it with Enid blyton books too. In one of hers they have a dog called the n word so probably more necessary with her work lol.

    All amazon have done is update the digital edition to the match the latest edition. There’s a million things to hate Amazon for you don’t have to make things up. And also if you want books that can’t be altered buy a paper book, you own them and they don’t run out of electricity.

    • @kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      And also if you want books that can’t be altered buy a paper book

      The books on my 1st generation kindle have been there 15 years unchanged. Just don’t connect devices to the internet that don’t need to be connected to the internet.

      The “internet of things” that was sold to us is just a way for corporations to exert more control. I am pro-technology. I think an ebook reader is infinitely more useful and valuable than a paper book - I can fit tens of thousands of books on my Kindle, more than I could read in a lifetime, and a full charge lasts more than a month at a time.

      I can use whatever font I want, I can scale the size to what I want. I can change the margins, place bookmarks, gives a % of how far I am in a book, skip to chapters, etc.

      Like, it’s objectively better than a book.

      But it doesn’t need to be connected to the internet.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Dahl was a great author but wasn’t a very pc person , his family have had to apologise for his anti semitism.

      That is putting it very mildly.

      "There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere. Even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”

      He said that in *checks notes* 1971.

      Worse, it was in response to criticism to an article he wrote that was justifiably criticizing Israel at a time when it wasn’t so popular to do so. And when he was accused of the old “you’re anti-Israel, so you’re anti-semitic” nonsense, he decided to go, “hell yeah I am!”

      • @AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Oof

        He’d probably like today’s politics, it seems fashionable to just lean into anything bad someone says about you.

    • @stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Changing words seems wrong with it sanitizing and makes future audiences unaware of how bigoted and flawed writers of a time period might be. It underplays cruel parts of society leading to a flawed rosy colored outlook. Now future readers won’t know how far from PC writers like Dahl were.

    • @Valmond@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      I’m not saying you should call anyone a removed but you americans sure have some strange problems with words if you can’t even put it in writing.

      Should we censor words like Nazi, Hitler, Accident, Hate, Rape, and so on? Who decides the approved words? How do you even transcribe events correctly?

      It’s like peopke think that there is nothing bad done if we just don’t talk about it.

      Smh

    • @solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Wait, if you have the old edition on your kindle, do they reach into your kindle and change what is there? Or do they just change the version in the store to the new edition, preferably with a new ISBN, if Kindles have ISBN’s?

      I remember about the Roald Dahl thing and it seemed pretty clear which edition people would be getting. And some of this stuff (according to another internet poster I mean) may have been intended to keep the books in copyright longer rather than to merely mess with the content. Blyton died in 1968 so her stuff could enter the public domain in the next few decades otherwise. That’s nefarious too.

      I remember for sure that Huckleberry Finn had the N word. Maybe little kids shouldn’t be reading it, I’m cool with that, though I read it as a kid myself. But grown-ups who do read it can deal with an unexpurgated version.

  • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 months ago

    I just buy physicals of the reference books I really want and pirate the digitals of anything else that isn’t sold DRM-free. I WILL own what I bought, whether they like it or not.

    • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      I wish I could do the same. I prefer paper books, we have a massive library and mostly read in our language on paper (except uni textbooks, I wouldn’t want to buy them and the library doesn’t have enough). However, that stopped being feasible when most of my non-fiction reading switched to English. Since English books are mostly not sold locally, I would have gone bankrupt on delivery costs alone. So thanks Libgen for my education.

  • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    204 months ago

    Amazon’s ebook store front (as well as the internet in general) is flooded with AI slop. The internet is a place where the signal to noise ratio is dropping rapidly.

    Physical media is necessary. Especially books. Especially the kinds of books regimes might want to ban. When it’s time to rebuild, we’ll need firm ground to stand on, and physical books work as long as you can hold them.

      • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        DRMless digital is great - I have a calibre library of thousands - but still more vulnerable.

        Canticle of Lebowitz is a great post apocalyptic novel. After the nukes, Catholic monasteries preserve the ancient tradition of copying down manuscripts. Text doesn’t require any form of infrastructure.

        There are also many texts/other media that are not available in any digital format. Obscure or older. For as much of an Information Age we are in, a lot of knowledge is being lost through neglect.

        • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          The overwhelming majority of my library is actually not digital-native - rather, pdf or djvu scans. I should really contribute to Libgen by scanning some of my library.

      • @wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I truly hate this age of video where everything is either in incredibly long form with unnecessary cruft that can be pared down to a page or so of real information, or the video is so pointlessly short it’s devoid of real value and context. Sadly people just don’t want to read anymore

  • @JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    144 months ago

    I’ve got an old Kindle, but not too old, which I jailbroke just yesterday with Winter break. I recommend that method for those considering getting drm free usage out of their device (instead of it contributing to ewaste).

    • @Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Been using 10th gen kindle, 5.17.1 firmware, as my daily driver. It’s not jailbroken, use calibre server to download my alternately sourced ebooks, convert to .mobi as needed.

      I looked at Winterbreak. Decided not to fool with it as I can still sail with stock.

      Any advantage to a jailbreak other than future proofing against side loading being disabled?

      • @JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I think that’s pretty much it. Future proofing seems to be the idea I’m getting, that and customisations/custom firmware. I used to have custom screensavers on one many years ago, which I’m going to do again.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Why not too old? I bought 4 gen 4 & 5 kindles off ebay for like $20 on purpose. I hate backlights and they still work great.