• Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Tldr: youtube forced ai into video monitoring and it keeps killing videos it shouldn’t, so instead of saying Ai is bad they’re blaming af blockers because why not lie when there’s no repercussions?

    YouTube views are dropping because they are using AI to vet and cull age innappropriate content from minors. the problem is the ai is very bad at its job and marks way too many videos as not advertiser friendly, which effectively kills YouTube promoting that video in feeds. this is the default view for new accounts, so you have to specifically turn off parental controls to see a normal feed. this started happening about 4 months ago. a number of channels I watch have made comments about this, including Redlettermedia

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not saying I don’t believe that’s what’s happening, but the article mentions nothing about any sort of YouTube AI interference.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    Something that I’ve been confused about ever since people have been talking about this, is that there didn’t seem to be a change of views from mobile devices. Like, I know that adblockers are less common on mobile devices because most people either don’t know they are available or aren’t using browsers that have/support (good) adblockers. But, was there really no noticeable change at all?

  • User79185@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Blocking ads for decades everywhere, life is sooo goood without that cancer.

    P.S. The only place were ads should appear are “yellow pages” thing, for example messenger channels just for that, where you intentionally join to look for local deals, discounts, contractors etc, especially to support local economy and not some megacorp. And ofc current google spying is not helping, block the ads, block trackers, it ruins the “steal the data” model.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 hours ago

    frustrated by ads that feel irrelevant

    What?

    Do they think we have a friend-or-foe system that only shoots down advertisements from adversaries?

    An ad is an ad, and should be terminated on sight.

  • alternategait@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m sure that the number of times I’ve decided “nah I don’t need to see that” after being told an ad blocker violated YouTube’s terms of service has absolutely nothing to do with it either.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Even on a computer without ad blocker (work laptop, chrome browser)

      the number of times i say “nah i don’t need to see that” as soon as thes annoying ads comes up before the video…

      The decline probably has very little to do with ad blockers.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It was the first thing most people assumed was the culprit, as it silently enabled Restricted Mode, but since the biggest difference came from Computer views, despite the age verification happening on all platforms, that is strong evidence against that having any impact

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s gotten to the point where I have to re-load each YT tab three times before the video ever starts playing - only because I use uBlock.

    Still better than watching ads, but it is getting annoying.

    • gndagreborn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      For me, it works without reloading… After a 15 second load and an insufferably laggy UI despite having no identifiable system bottleneck.

    • Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is like they know you’re using adblocks, so instead of trying to force ads down your throat, they try making your experience miserable by breaking their own viewer or whatever. It is absolutely petty of them.

      Leave a video sitting there in idle for too long, come back, it plays for 10 seconds then has to reload itself. Sometimes, it doesn’t do this, so it requires a complete refresh.

      They can do this bullshit all they want but I am not letting up on blocking ads.

    • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I have a theory that YT deliberately makes you wait the length an ad would have been if you have uBlock Origin installed. Ive just let it “buffer” for 30 seconds or so and it will eventually load the video.

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I have the same problem, and after you start clicking play, often you can wait it out and the video will eventually play on its own after 10-15 seconds

  • 001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    For reference, here are the exceptions I’ve been using to try to make sure my viewership counts. Not sure if they’re all needed and they’re probably overkill, but:

    @@||youtube.com/api$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||youtube.com/youtubei$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||youtube.com/ptracking$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||play.google.com/log$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    ! these are meant for checking for active internet connection (https://www.techtapto.com/what-is-gstatic-why-you-see-it-often/#Is_Gstatic_com_generate_204_a_virus)
    @@||youtube.com/generate_204$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||google.com/generate_204$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||youtube.com/gen_204$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    @@||google.com/gen_204$domain=youtube.com|google.com
    
    • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Literally the only way they will learn. I really don’t understand how we as a society have accepted ads as a necessary evil. We all hate them, but we all also make them work. It’s horrible.

      • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s going to take a big cultural shift to get enough people to pay content creators through subscriptions to compete with ad-driven models.

        Eventually YouTube’s hubris will cross the line where enough people will just assume the ads are so bad it’s not worth trying to watch a video. As somebody with technical means and no tolerance for ads I’m astonished more people aren’t there yet.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          How much do we need to pay though? Most content creators I see have their patreon around $7 CDN/mo. Add even a couple and you’re now at the cost of a streaming subscription with much more content. I would have no problem paying content creators if the fees were more reasonable, but right now I only subscribe to a couple.

          Should a creator’s patreon drop in price to $1 or $2 a month, or should the viewer pay a small fee per view? What new monetization system would make sense where the consumer doesn’t have an unaffordable pile of subscriptions, but the creators still get paid a fair rate for their effort?

          • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 minutes ago

            Nebula seems pretty cool, it’s basically a bunch of YouTubers mirroring their youtube content and making original videos for a paid streaming service with no ads. That’s one way of doing it

      • sdcSpade@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’ve been wondering for a while where the point of diminishing returns is. Surely, at some point, ads become aggressive enough to have an adverse effect on advertisers?

        • avatar@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I often wonder how ads of any kind have ever worked, unless it was an ad for something we had already planned on buying.

          • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Ads are super effective. If you have something to buy, but you don’t know much about it, you will tend towards buying the thing that was advertised to you more often than not just because you are more familiar with it over other things. You might not stick with it, but being the first thing someone tries is huge.

          • snooggums@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Repetition brings familiarity and familiarity leads to trust for the vast majority of humans. It is the reason that campaign signs works, why brand names are so valuable, and why popularity tends to increase exponentially when it works.

            Most ads are just intended to get you to remember the thing they are selling.

        • other_cat@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Well, this abstract says it’s about 20% effective over not advertising but this is a meta analysis and isn’t focused exclusively on internet ads.

          The baked in biases being that the authors are “a German chaired professor of marketing at the European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder), Germany” and his research assistant.

      • ngdev@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        i know what im about to do is beyond the pale on lemmy but here it is anyway. for youtube, they have to spend money to host the content and deliver it. you can pay a subscription fee to enable them to do that. they have ads on there for people who expect free shit forever

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Are these “we all” people you talking about are in the same room with us right now? I don’t really think that would apply to all of us.

    • 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      All these sites monitor engagement, they walk the line between maximum ads and users. If we decrease the users, they’ll decrease the ads to try and keep us.

      • Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They’ll just insert bots who’ll comment generic, soulless things to say instead. “OMG This product amazed me!” or “I cannot BELIEVE how nobody discovered this sooner!” all the while artificially inflating numbers.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        10 hours ago

        LOL, nah. If we decrease the users, they’ll increase the ads to try to compensate for declining revenue. They believe they have all the power and don’t give a fuck what we think.

  • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If the Google war on ad blocking meant the ad blockers accidently blocked something everyone wants its still Google fault.

    Everything was fine until Google decided to change how everything works over and over again to get people to watch the awful ads they let on their platform.

  • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    YouTube is completely broken on my Apple TV — the last platform I have which actually does display ads. When the app loads, I get a black screen. When I tap on a video (click on it? on the remote?) it goes black, stutters through an ad, stutters through the next one, then stutters through the video for a couple seconds. Sometimes I have to start the video over. If I were running an ad blocker, I would expect static like this… but I’m not. I don’t have a PiHole. The Apple TV has direct, unfiltered access to my WiFi. The ads are showing, but the app is just… broken. On my computers (Macs) I get a perfect experience, because I use Firefox with uBlock Origin like a sane person who knows what they’re doing.

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The black screen on the TV could be related to your TV’s HDR settings. Only recent TVs have started to decrease that temporary stutter between SDR/HDR.

      It was annoying as hell in ad rolls before I started to pay for YT lite so my kid wouldn’t be advertised to.

      No longer paying since they shuttered the YT Kids app on TvOS.

  • Pavidus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Lemme try and feel sorry for my cartoonishly rich tech overlords real quick…

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      also it seems too convenient for them for this to happen just after they removed ad blockers from chrome…

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I assume the recent forced JS which recently broke downloaders and alt front-ends is connected to this somehow.