xia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoIt will be great, they said...lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1668arrow-down1110
arrow-up1558arrow-down1imageIt will be great, they said...lemmy.sdf.orgxia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square104linkfedilink
minus-squares@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down8·4 days agoYour slop-pooping machine is bad at text parallax and it still looks gross
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down7·edit-24 days agoYou’re a slop-pooping machine.
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·4 days agoThis seems more like a poorly assembled template than GenAI
minus-squareAnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·4 days agoIt is definitely both. The tie pattern is probably the most obvious artifact, but the lighting and focus being inconsistent is what kicks off the intuitive “this is definitely GenAI” sense
minus-squares@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoThe image is hypersaturated and hyperaveraged
Your slop-pooping machine is bad at text parallax and it still looks gross
You’re a slop-pooping machine.
Don’t shame me for my IBS
This seems more like a poorly assembled template than GenAI
It is definitely both.
The tie pattern is probably the most obvious artifact, but the lighting and focus being inconsistent is what kicks off the intuitive “this is definitely GenAI” sense
The image is hypersaturated and hyperaveraged