It rewards preventing growth specifically via redistribution, whereas a laissez-faire approach is quickly punished, in brazen defiance of Western economic principles.
The indoctrination of tall poppy syndrome couldn’t be any clearer: accumulation of tetrominoes is so terrible that it’s better to spread them out and have them be destroyed.
It has trickle down game mechanics, but it’s game over if the trickled down resources get back to the top. Does that make it some form of Neo-Keynesism?
game is about preventing growth, possibly supports a degrowth agenda?
It rewards preventing growth specifically via redistribution, whereas a laissez-faire approach is quickly punished, in brazen defiance of Western economic principles.
The indoctrination of tall poppy syndrome couldn’t be any clearer: accumulation of tetrominoes is so terrible that it’s better to spread them out and have them be destroyed.
It has trickle down game mechanics, but it’s game over if the trickled down resources get back to the top. Does that make it some form of Neo-Keynesism?
line go down