Pearl@lemmy.ml to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoMetal Exclusionary Radical Astronomylemmy.mlimagemessage-square276linkfedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down134file-text
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageMetal Exclusionary Radical Astronomylemmy.mlPearl@lemmy.ml to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square276linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up110arrow-down6·1 month agoThe non-Hydrogen, non-Helium atoms are a larger proportion of total mass, but that’s just because they’re really fat.
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up61arrow-down1·1 month agoWe don’t call them fat. They’re BBA: big beautiful atoms. Thicc would suffice too.
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 month agoThe 12 yo in me is giggling like crazy right now.
minus-squareicelimit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21 month agoWhat are you doing with a 12yo inside you?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 month agoWould be a lot cooler if those were scaled accordingly
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThere is scaling going on there, just not 1:1. Like the hydrogen is smaller than the rest, but it should be about half the size of the one above.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoIt’s barely perceptible. I just see a rainbow of butts.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWe’ve all had dreams Lee that.
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·1 month agoThat’s not true. The “fatness” of metallic atoms doesn’t even come close to overcoming how rare they are. Hydrogen and helium combined still make up ~98% of the total mass fraction. Oxygen, which is next in line, is only about 1% the total mass.
minus-squarebjorney@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-21 month agoThey said “larger proportion”, and 2% is larger than 1% /s
minus-squarecryoistalline@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1 month agoits a vocal minority, don’t pay them any attention
minus-squareTaldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoIt looks like this chart is based on mass, rather than number. By number hydrogen is >90% by itself
The non-Hydrogen, non-Helium atoms are a larger proportion of total mass, but that’s just because they’re really fat.
We don’t call them fat. They’re BBA: big beautiful atoms. Thicc would suffice too.
The 12 yo in me is giggling like crazy right now.
What are you doing with a 12yo inside you?
Better than reverse
Would be a lot cooler if those were scaled accordingly
There is scaling going on there, just not 1:1. Like the hydrogen is smaller than the rest, but it should be about half the size of the one above.
It’s barely perceptible. I just see a rainbow of butts.
We’ve all had dreams Lee that.
That’s not true. The “fatness” of metallic atoms doesn’t even come close to overcoming how rare they are. Hydrogen and helium combined still make up ~98% of the total mass fraction. Oxygen, which is next in line, is only about 1% the total mass.
They said “larger proportion”, and 2% is larger than 1%
/s
Actually, it’s twice as large!
its a vocal minority, don’t pay them any attention
Not really
It looks like this chart is based on mass, rather than number. By number hydrogen is >90% by itself