This is a joke about face sitting.

Season 7 episode 21, Assie Come Home

  • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t this the same country that has a pedo prince, and ties to the biggest pedo ring in modern history? Something about a Seville too…

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s also going to make that porn more popular. Media bans don’t actually work because of how media demand works. Supply and demand don’t naturally coordinate for media exchange, except by apply risk to non-paying recipients of media. That’s how copyright works. If you apply risk to non-paying recipients for a different reason, economics doesn’t care about your reason. Just that you applied risk. Risk applied to paying parties goes into a different part of the formula. The result is total demand goes up (cash changing hand motivating production), but it becomes sold as a contraban.

      D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR, F(free) V(value) R(risk) C(commercial)

      Because these are all distributions. Subtracting the CR distribution from that more complex part never gives you a zero distribution. But if FR is uniformly zero, demand goes to zero. Once you introduce FR you open the window of coordination (modifier of CV) to be non-zero. Because copyright enforcement is lax for pornography, FR is basically zero now. But it’s about to not be.

      It’s the same reason commercial production of CSAM increases.

      Ok, bye.

      • herrpfad@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is some explanation missing before this makes sense. In which units is demand measured? In currency? In amounts of “media”? What is free risk supposed to mean? And what is commercial risk? And how can it be the same unit as free and commercial value, and demand? 1€ risk? How do you apply it? How can they be distributions? Are we talking about probability distributions? What if CV < CR argh… Where can I find answers?

    • jobbies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t this the same country that has a pedo prince

      No.

      and ties to the biggest pedo ring in modern history?

      I take it you mean Epstein? In which case plenty of countries have ties but predominantly US.

      Something about a Seville too…

      We do like our oranges and Spanish holidays.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I did a deep dive into this last week. Part of the confusion is because facesitting got banned a decade ago, in 2014. There was a protest where sex workers sat on faces outside Parliament and everyone sang Monty Python’s Sit On My Face. The ban was overturned in 2020, then relitigated nowadays in 2026 when a new law banned suffocation. A popular porn website I’ve never heard of before last week said facesitting is suffocation, hence the current internet drama.

    Folks, your face sitting is still perfectly legal, but you may have to go to court to argue it, because there’s no precedent establishing it yet.

  • Killer57@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    With this new law effect in the UK, does that mean that most of Totally Spies is banned there?

  • marzhall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nah, he plausibly can breath so it’s okay, if I understand the stupid bill’s logic.

    “What if the half-pints (who shouldn’t be on those soites without a porno loicense anyway!) learn the wrong way to have a mad hatter!”