• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    crowder seems to have largely disappeared from the GRIFTERSPHERE, after video of him assaulting his wife. and there are instances of him Sexually harrassing MALE-only employees too.

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Legitimately every Republican I met is defending themselves, from taking money from the Government, while every leftest is fighting for everyone else to take money from gov programs. Why are retardpublicans so worried about poor people taking from the rich while also stealing the same benefits from working Americans who need it. “Riches for me but no one else” is literally their tagline

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They’ll say “if they’re clever enough to not pay taxes then that’s fine by me!” as billionaires pay less than 1% real tax because they get to write the laws and then they’ll claim that a city bike lane has stolen their tax money.

      They’re stupid as hell. Like, profundly fucking stupid. Conservatives are so pathetic and I’m embarrassed to be considered part of the same species as them.

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There’s nothing evolutionary about it. Humans have been doing altruism and cooperation for hundreds of thousands of years. It’s cultural.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    SNAP shouldn’t be necessary for anyone who works. The fact that in America someone can have a job and yet still needs SNAP to survive is absolutely disgusting and disrespectful. Pay people a living wage jfc.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A new law should be passed, if you have a job and qualify for SNAP then your employer needs to increase your pay by 100 percent until you don’t qualify for SNAP anymore.

      • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Or we just stop the system where the corporations could buy laws to enable this, and their brutal enforcement.

        The reason why laws are important, why you believe they’re just, is because they’re supposed to be the aggregate will of the people, and in practice, they’re just not.

        The only people ive ever talked to who thought the state should need to support someone who was working full time with food and housing and stuff is tankies, actual ML’s who believed that that should be the core of the state. I guess in their ideal world there wouldn’t be anything fucked up about that, but we don’t live there.

        It’s not just the laws that are fucked here, its the entire system of law as thing that expresses and protects what people and communities want that has been almost precisely reversed in function, and whose enforcers make all of us live in fear. That’s what needs to be fixed. The underlying systems that are not doing what it says on the package, because that’s not what they were ever for. To continue trying to tweak the gun to your head until it cleans dirt off your floor is insane and unreasonable.

        What did the Walton’s for example actually do to control this much of the economy, to direct so much of it to their own whims and personal enrichment with no regard for or even explicit exclusion of the rest of us? Who thinks it was anything that deserved that kind of wealth?

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Right. They are stealing your livelihood from both ends, not living up to their side of the bargain and blame you for this problem. America s should all collectively not show up to work for a week and see if the tune changes, cause I’ll bet it sure as shit would.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The argument my friend always says is this cant happen or all small businesses will be shut down because only corps will be able to pay that high wage.

      Counter point?

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Turns out, a large portion of people using SNAP are employees of these “corps” (source), quote:

        … The story repeats in all nine states. Walmart and McDonald’s were the corporations with the most employees using SNAP.

        We are basically subsidizing their employees’ wages with our tax money. And at the same time, all those money goes to these companies’ bottom line. (where do you think their employees spend their SNAP money?)

        This is a fucking scam, and must be stopped. These corporations must pay their employees a living wage, otherwise they must not be allowed to operate.

      • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        As it turns out, most small businesses pay a higher wage than the big corps. Average wages end up going down when a town gets Walmarted because Walmart pays less than the small businesses it drives out.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You can imagine how that went.

    They’re always so proud of upsetting other people, like it’s a major win in the struggle for political dominance.

    “I shat in the mall. You can imagine how that went.”

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s hard for me to understand how someone can be such a piece of shit. Like yeah, let’s let children starve for no reason at all.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No reason at all?! Are you kidding? They’re doing it for profit. It’s all for the bottom line! If a few kids starve, who cares? Most of them are brown anyway.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The funniest part is the stores and their suppliers are pushing for SNAP benefits in the interest of profits, so the profiteering is fighting itself.

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think they also genuinely enjoy it and believe somewhere in the future whoever is left will thank them for it

      • axx@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I think it’s more than that, they are heavily invested in a rather nasty version of the “just world hypothesis”: if bad stuff happens to these people, like being poor and hungry, it’s because they are bad and deserve it.

        It’s the same logic at play for blaming victims or rape and sexual violence.

        Because the alternative, that the world isn’t fair and horrible stuff happens to good people and good things also happen to horrible people, is too unpleasant and exhausting to contemplate and requires complex thought.

        • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Specifically, breaking the just world illusion is unpleasant and exhausting because it removes the only reassurance they have that they are good people.

          If they prosper in a just world then they are good. If you convince them the world is unjust then they have to grapple with being an awful person who has done and said awful things.

          It’s virtually impossible to convince someone of that

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Oh yup, they love that circular reasoning bias, eh? The cart is supposed to go before the horse. They are rich because god wants them to be. The poor are poor because god is judging them. Pay no attention to the suffering, or you’re going against god!

          Oh to start teaching philosophy and epistemology to children. Then maybe fewer would grow up with such harmful toxic dogmatic ideologies riddled with this circular reasoning fallacy.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s hard for me to understand how someone can be such a piece of shit.

      Literally how he gets paid. He’s a man-child whose every act of petulance and grotesqueness fattens his wallet and raises his social media profile. The only reason he’s not filling the hole left by Charlie Kirk’s neck is because Nick Fuentes, Ben Shapiro, and JD Vance all scrambled in first.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I think Chowder’s career is over after the video of him verbally abusing his pregnant wife came out.

        So glad I don’t have to see that guy anymore.

        • snooggums@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Trump raped his wife* and became president.

          *technically not rape because the law defined rape in a limited way at the time, kind of like how husbands were exempt in the past

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Steven Crowder is no Trump.

            I don’t know if I could ever tell you why, but people find Trump charismatic to a point where he can apparently get away with literally anything.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Seems hate and rage bait channels are all the rage lately. Just cultivate more hate and bullshit. Good job america.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Nice use of TM there.

        The corporate orwellian spin there, yup. What would Jesus Christ do? He wants you to be prosperous, so, starve those children.

    • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The sad thing about the pandemic and the shift in the political scene is that waaaaay too many people are shitty this way. Not just rich people either. Being a shit human being has gone viral.

      • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I just don’t get the “fuck you I got mine” mentality. There’s no empathy from these people. They think everyone who is poor made dumb choices and poor people should suffer for making those dumb choices. After all, just getting a job will sort everything right out according to conservatives, and getting a job is easy to them. They have never been affected by conditions that lead to poverty and it shows.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They have never been affected by conditions that lead to poverty and it shows.

          But if you go somewhere like Idaho or Mississippi… They’re all fucking poor!! Everyone is poor! Everyone lives hand to mouth and depends on social safety nets like this. But if you’re proper homeless then fuck you, no you don’t deserve any help?

          Blows my mind how entire self contained societies can all equally experience this kind of hardship and then instead of “I don’t want anyone else to suffer like we had to”, they instead conclude “I had to suffer like this, therefore everyone must suffer like this”.

        • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They have never been affected by conditions that lead to poverty and it shows.

          You mean being lazy? Of course not. They’ll be the first to brag about how they work overtime or have more than 1 job to pay the bills.

          /s, in case that want obvious.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          A lot of it has to do with an inflated view of one’s self and persecusion complex. Studies have shown that the more conservative one is the better off one thinks they will be. When the whole inheritance tax was being talked about all these poor conservtives thought some day they will be so well off the tax would affect them when in reality their lifetime gross income wouldn’t be enough if they saved it all. The whole “work hard and you will get everything” idea is burned into their brains inspite of reality.

          When you then look at any achievement by these same people they make it out to be some crazy effort on their side. All hardships were the extreme and targeting them, in their warped view. They don’t realize their struggles were the same as everyone else and they were helped out in many ways that no one ever picks themselves up by their bootstraps.

          So they have this “my life was the worst” and “i pulled myself up with no help” view of their lives that everyone else is just shit. In reality they are so delusional that even common decency is forign to them. Pile on that many are Christians if poor and narcissist and sociopaths if rich the complex grow many fold.

          • RBWells@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I think this is closer. I read once that the happiest people in the world were conservatives living in countries with a strong social safety net, and lots of government subsided programs, because they simultaneously benefited from the programs and believed their success was something they achieved on their own.

            So even if they were poor and got out, they take a different lesson from it. Not “there but for the grace of God go I” or “wow, I’m so glad I got subsidized education and food when I needed it so that I could get here” but more “I got mine fuck you”

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Shit like that doesn’t need to be debated.

    Even in Ancient Rome they had a grain dole that… paid for itself! With interest! Because the poor who would otherwise struggle to buy wheat or barley got it, and could buy other stuff, even luxury items. The result is that more and more trade flowed directly to Rome and people made a bundle doing it.

    And also less hungry people means less desperate people and it means more stability. Something that basically everyone wants.

    But yes, these same right-wing grifters even attacked the grain dole in Ancient Rome as if it lead to the fall of the Roman Empire.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Pretty simple when it’s spelled out like that.

      But then… It’s troubling, that even this simple’s still out of reach for some short sighted greedy stupid smugnorant hypocritical parasitic narcissistic trolls.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      But giving away grain to peasants is why the entire empire fell to ruin! Letting people starve is the most humane way of reducing hunger in the long run, it just takes strong leadership to do what most be done. Really, it’ll be faster, easier, and cheaper (which is by definition better for everyone) if we help accelerate things. Which will be the next bit of societal tough love that Crowder will be taking the high road on.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Why? They’re a bunch of farmers out there, and it’s like a half hour from the freeway and another hour or two to an airport.

      Surely somewhere like Utah Valley University wouldn make more sense. 😜

  • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Also this piece of shit doesnt have a mind worth changing. Just ignore him and use the calvin version of the meme, or better yet dont use that format anymore.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Seems a safe bet it’s the latter.

      Feigns being reasonable and rational, when really he’s already decided what the truth is, stubbornly sticking to his naive realism. All just a ploy. Seems he thrives on it. Narcissistic troll indeed. By his actions.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Please set up your dinky little table somewhere with many tall buildings Steven.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If that’s 33 years, then that would mean an individual gets $2121 a year, or $176 a month. Either the SNAP benefits are garbage or this person is exaggerating.

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Well, look at these moneybags with 187 a month. My elderly neighbor on a fixed income gets 17.00 a month.

    • plateee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s garbage.

      Barely enough to survive on, and if you try to get a second job to supplement income, better hope you don’t go beyond the income limits. In Alabama, that’s $1,631/mo or about $407 per week. If you make $408? Congrats! No more SNAP.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Rice and beans have historically been pretty cheap. You can survive on SNAP if you’ve got a place to live and no other options. You certainly won’t be thriving.

        It’s the economic equivalent of emergency life support.

        • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The only way I managed to have somewhat decent meals while on SNAP was being lucky enough to have a decently sized discount grocer nearby.

          That also meant all the meat I bought was only 2-3 days from the sell-by date, and they weren’t fucking around with that. If you didn’t freeze it, it started going off quickly. Most of my produce came from cans or microwave bags, anything “fresh” was as close to going off as the meat. Dry goods were a mixed bag of overstock, damaged out, and sold so poorly in other stores it got shunted off to discounts just to move.

          The freshest things they got in were milk and eggs. Those sold out within the day of delivery. If you couldn’t get there early, you went without.

    • Bosht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I know it differs per state but for a single member household the max benefit is approx $300 a month. It goes up when adding more family members, with a household of 4 getting approx $1k per month. I guess it is possible that a state offers lower benefits per family member, so $176 isn’t too far of a stretch per person. The fact of the matter is that he did it and got away with it, not how many people he technically robbed.

      • Duranie@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        19 hours ago

        In 2019 I lost my job and ended up on unemployment. At the time my sons were all still living with me, 20, 18, and 17yo. Unemployment +1 dependant was enough to cover my modest mortgage. My other 2 sons paid the utilities and anything else came from my savings account. We received $15mo in Snap benefits.

        It’s hard not to slap people who think people with Snap are skating through life.

        • Bosht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah anyone I’ve experienced that talks shit about SNAP has never been in dire enough straights to actually need that safety net. It’s always assholes that have had someone to fall back on, people they can ask for money, or spend mommy and daddy’s money without consequence. I support these systems because I know what being dropped on your ass is like and not knowing where your next meal is going to come from. Nobody, especially children, deserve to go hungry in the modern world.

        • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I was on snap in college and I had to resubmit the paperwork to apply every 3 months. What I got would change every time I refiled. I feel like it had a lot to do with which caseworker I got. Sometimes the paperwork would come in the mail past the deadline for the interview and I would have to restart the process.