• dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    this feels like a potentially sincere attempt to recruit people into an anti-science conspiracy movement - this doesn’t really feel different than the kind of reasoning you see with moon landing denialists or flat earthers.

    • Syndication@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Eh I wouldn’t take it too seriously, I’m pretty sure it’s a play on the whole running joke of “saying something ridiculous, then end it with ‘You guys don’t seriously believe this right?!?’” type of thing. I’ve seen many of these greentexts that used that format recently.

      It’s kinda funny to me because it loosely reminds me of same logic as those old rage comic “troll physics” memes like these:

    • village604
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s actually not a bad question, just one people don’t really think about. Why does room temperature water sublimate evaporate?

      It’s because the temperature is an average, and some molecules at the surface have enough energy to break their polar bonds.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, evaporate would be the appropriate word here, while sublimate would be for room temperature ice, which I don’t know if it is ice that does it or if there is a microscopic film of water that then evaporates.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Technically, water does sublimate, just not at normal earth pressures. Below 0.6 kPa it transitions straight from solid to gas.

      • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wanna say Bill Nye had a little contraption that explained this phenomenon. A cup with a piston on one end that vibrated. The top part of the cup had a ring in the center where little balls in the cup could fit. The piston represented the temperature (energy). Even at a lower temperature, some balls could randomly fly into the little hole and into the other partition. Turning the temperature up (increasing the speed and power of the piston) made more balls more frequently “evaporate.” I wish I could find that demonstration again.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah. I remember back in high-school there were some who “disproved” the 3rd law of motion by pushing a door closed and saying that they didn’t go backwards.
      I didn’t care to engage them in debate.