• @NateNate60@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I would say GNU is one that’s openly socialist. If Linux’s (or rather, Linus Torvald’s) philosophy is socialist, they either do a very good job of hiding the fact or there is a lot I don’t know about them.

        • @frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Unpopular opinion: “Open Source”, spawned from Netscape spinning off Mozilla, laid out in definition by the OSI organization, and advocated for by AnCaps like Eric S. Raymond, was always fundamentally capitalist. Devs spending a lot of free time doing free work for companies was not an accident. Capitalists borrowing ideas from the left and twisting them for their own uses is not new, either.

          Free Software is more rooted in communism. You’re doing this to help your community. RMS might have always denied it–probably because it wasn’t a good idea to advocate that way during the Cold War and after–but it’s a better philosophical fit.

          It’s past time to divorce the two.

  • @qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    669 months ago

    I realize we’re inherently not capitalistic platform because everyone has the access to own their portion. Pretty cool imo and not to toot the horn for the millionth time, it definitely seems like the future of the internet

  • @robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    599 months ago

    My partner has been insinuating that I’m a communist recently. I don’t think I’m a communist, I simply want to seize the means of production for the people.

  • Trollivier
    link
    fedilink
    519 months ago

    I mean… It’s one of the reasons I like it so much here.

          • @Im_old@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            deep breath So I’m not the most star trek nerd by any measure, but I grew up watching the next generation (TNG), but also some of the original star trek series. And then deep space 9 (DS9) and enterprise. Also the one with the one which is not the enterprise and they got lost (forgot the name). But I’ve lost interest with the recent series. So not a uber nerd but I’ve watched quite a bit.

            I think starting with the MOVIES of the first series is good. But also starting with the series of TNG is ok.

          • @AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            I literally started due to lemmy posts. I just went in order and watched TOS and TNG. Now I’m going through DS9. I’m really glad I did, because it’s amazing!

          • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            As others have said, DS9, Lower Decks, TNG, Voyager, are all great choices. Strange New Worlds isn’t bad either.

            Now some potential dealbreakers: Lower Decks is a cartoon and heavily references other shows (but does explain most of those references), TNG is very libbed up and side-steps a lot of the moral questions Startrek is known for, Voy solves those questions with warcrimes, SNW tries to be too inoffensive and is very much directed at fans. I can’t think of anything bad to say about DS9.

            • @Opisek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Is there any order to watch Star Trek in or can I just pick any and roll with it. Will I be missing any important information?

              • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Nah, no order.

                When the shows bring in stuff from older shows, they explain it in episode, or you’ll figure out the gist of it from the framing, the writers themselves often hadn’t watched every single episode of the older shows.

                I think SNW and LD are the only ones where the writers actually bothered to watch everything.

        • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          It’s also voluntarism: the OS, as it is entirely maintained by willing members of the community.

          Honestly, probably moreso in most cases, as while socialism is fine with getting funding from taxation voluntarism sees that as coercive by nature, advocating for voluntary donations (time/money/labor) to help out the community instead. Some stuff was developed with tax funding for sure, and some directly by the NSA like SELinux iirc, but I think it’s still mainly private citizens/corpo donations and volunteers/people that get paid using those donations.

    • @NateNate60@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      469 months ago

      I want to seize the means of production as much as the next guy but it gets kinda boring after a while if that’s the only content available

      • @Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        169 months ago

        Sometimes there are cats! That’s always fun! Some of those cats want socialism too, but they’re still cats!

      • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        It doesnt get boring hearing about how judges demolish bodily autonomy of women and commit other atrocities in the name of corporate freedom.

            • Cowbee [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              There’s a massive overlap between being anti-Marx and being liberal. Doesn’t mean all anti-Marxists are liberals, but most are.

              • Possibly linux
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -49 months ago

                I consider myself conservative.

                I’ll let myself out before this comment thread explodes

              • Fiona
                link
                fedilink
                69 months ago

                No it’s more likely that they are an actual leftist. China and Ruzzia are (and the SU was!) fascist hellholes that have nothing to do with socialism and/or communism besides screaming it of the windows all the time.

                And people who delude themselves to believe something else are really annoying…

                • WillStealYourUsername
                  link
                  fedilink
                  19 months ago

                  I agree in spirit! However the soviet union was neither capitalist nor communist, and fascism is a form of capitalism which means the soviet union wasn’t fascist, but rather something else entirely.

              • Psychadelligoat
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                Fun fact: blocking a community doesn’t stop you from mentioning them in a joking manner elsewhere!

    • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -29 months ago

      Nine times out of ten it’s incorrectly defined by idealists that haven’t figured out that a fair amount of American sociological and economic standards are already steeped in socialist services, and the rest of the rhetoric that defines socialism would absolutely fail if attempted in America.

      In short, nine times out of ten, a socialist has absolutely no fucking idea what they’re talking about, but just parroting smug bullshit that they think makes them look edgy and educated.

      • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        109 months ago

        a fair amount of American sociological and economic standards are already steeped in socialist services

        If you believe this to be true then you don’t understand what socialism actually is. You seem to be of the mind that any publicly funded service or welfare is socialist, and I don’t blame you for thinking this since it is what the mainstream American political discourse would have you believe.

        In short, nine times out of ten, a socialist has absolutely no fucking idea what they’re talking about, but just parroting smug bullshit that they think makes them look edgy and educated.

        When you say this immediately after demonstrating that you actually have no idea what you’re talking about it’s a pretty bad look. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        Drag thinks the means of production should be owned by the workers. Drag is curious why you think the American workers own “a fair amount” of the means of production.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -69 months ago

      socialism itself is just, kinda weird. From a philosophical perspective it makes sense and has clear distinctions. But from a practical view it’s just sort of. Capitalism but if it was more confusing for some reason. If you go too far into one direction, it’s just communism, and that’s not socialism, obviously. The other direction and it’s literally just capitalism, so it has to sit in this weird space between where you can’t engage with the best parts of capitalism (or it just weirdly handicaps parts of capitalism) and communism.

      and then of course you’ve got people (probably grifters) like hasan piker who claim to be socialist while having millions of dollars, but doing literally nothing with it, because investing it wouldn’t be socialist, and you can’t really just give it away, because well, it’s a lot of money. I mean you could, but it’s also just, sort of redundant at that point.

      Realistically he should be investing that money into a lot of different things, increasing returns on revenues, and creating a content creator collective or something silly like that, but to my knowledge he hasn’t probably because he’s either stupid or lazy. I don’t blame him for either of those things though.

      socialism, particularly modern western socialism that’s based on capital needs a fundamental proof of concept work-through before we can really do anything with it, i think.

      Capitalism, while it has problems, it at least makes sense on a fundamental human perspective. I own things, you own things, we own things, that also applies to capital as well. It’s so fundamentally tied to the human experience and history that it’s just sort of hard to deviate from. Even china does a lot of capitalism.

      man that was much longer than i anticipated. Apologies in retrospective lol.

      Anyway for the second part of the admittedly very old and dead joke by this point in the post. It’s a meme about socialism on the internet. (particularly a farther left space on the internet)

  • @buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    389 months ago

    I just hate how it is vilified when we literally freely give billions in taxpayer monies to oil companies.

      • WillStealYourUsername
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hexbear is a tankie instance

        Edit: being anti-sectarian is not an excuse Edit 2: Because tankies are not socialists

          • WillStealYourUsername
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            Why would anarchists associate with tankies? I don’t wanna share any space with authoritarians of any kind

            • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              79 months ago

              It is certainly not without historical precedent. Anarchists were quite heavily involved with the Russian revolution for example, although many historical-revisionist marxist-leninists would prefer to downplay that.

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                49 months ago

                MLs don’t downplay the participation of Anarchists in the Russian Revolution, at least not from what I have seen.

                • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  79 months ago

                  I appreciate that you don’t, I even have you tagged as “a polite marxist” so I must have had a positive interaction with you before, but many MLs I’ve debated before have downplayed anarchist contributions to the Russian revolution. I can understand how you might not encounter that very often since you’re not putting yourself out there as an anarchist.

              • WillStealYourUsername
                link
                fedilink
                09 months ago

                Historically it has never worked out very well for the anarchists, so I would hope that they have learned their lesson by now

                • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  59 months ago

                  Point taken, but although it may not have ended well for the anarchists I believe their involvement in the Russian revolution was for the better since it could easily have gone in a much worse direction without them. Anarchists are always putting themselves in harm’s way to make this world a better place.

            • Cowbee [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              59 months ago

              Ask the Anarchists on Hexbear why they’re fine with Marxists.

              In my experience, Hexbear is a much less toxic instance due to the anti-sectarian rules. Someone described it as “less like a Communist Party and more like the bar Communists hang out at after the meeting,” which is both cute and accurate. It’s a nice atmosphere if you aren’t a liberal.

              • WillStealYourUsername
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It’s a nice atmosphere if you aren’t a liberal.

                Doesn’t sound like it would have a nice atmosphere for socialists or anarchists either

                Edit: Also that place allows coordinated attacks against non-tankies, and the most troubling users from blåhaj ran to that place, so I’m not super impressed.

                • Cowbee [he/they]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  59 months ago

                  Doesn’t sound like it would have a nice atmosphere for socialists or anarchists either

                  Like I said, you can ask the anarchists and socialists there yourself. I’m a Marxist-Leninist, it’s a nice atmosphere, and I get along with the Anarchists there as well.

                  Edit: Also that place allows coordinated attacks against non-tankies, and the most troubling users from blåhaj ran to that place, so I’m not super impressed.

                  Mind explaining what you mean by “coordinated attacks?” And what do you mean by “troubling users from blåhaj?” People leaving one instance for Hexbear isn’t necessarily indicative of Hexbear being bad.