• @owl@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1031 month ago

    These standing seats have been coming next year for the past decade, but they always failed safety tests. Planes need to be evacuated within a certain time frame, which does not work when the plane is too densely packed.

      • @owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Pilots were asked about the problem and one said “I sen guards to the exits to help with the evacuation.”

    • @Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 month ago

      Did the stronger younger people try pushing the frail and children out of the way during these safety tests? Because I feel like the plane world empty quickly in that scenario

      • @owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “Do you feel capable of opening the exit in case of an emergency?”
        – Yes.
        “Do you feel capable of throwing the old woman behind you of of the window in case of an emergency?”
        – What?
        “Do you know how to punch someone unconscious if they fall to hysteria in case of an emergency?”
        – I would like to leave the plane now.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -131 month ago

      I think we should relax rules on how quickly it is to evaluate a plane, and focus more on keeping the plane in the sky. (looking at you Boeing)

      I’d love sleeping pods or bunk beds on a plane and accept the higher risk of not being able to get out quickly.

      Cars and probably even train are infinitely more dangerous and we accept those risks every day.

      • @Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        331 month ago

        There is no legitimate reason why trains or cars should be more dangerous modes of transport than flights. It is just that the lobbies for cars and capitalist train operations successfully desensitized everyone to it, so “deadly car crash” is just shrugged away. In the US we see similar attempts to make planes less safe and just accept the numbers of people killed in preventable events.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
          link
          fedilink
          English
          321 month ago

          IDK about trains, but the problem with cars is that we let people operate them with minimal training and practically no oversight. You see shit on roads daily where if the driver was flying a plane, they wouldn’t even be let on as a passenger anymore ever.

          • @Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            101 month ago

            We could increase the training requirements and oversight. We could design road-networks in a way that makes speeding more difficult and enact stricter speed limits.

            Whenever these measures are taking in an area they greatly reduce the number of people killed or seriously injured.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 month ago

              We could increase the training requirements and oversight.

              I wish.

              And who’s going to tell all those people that they are not going to drive again, ever? In pilot training, even showing signs of bravado or machismo is grounds for getting failed. The problem is that if you do that those people will go and vote you out, especially in this climate.

              One of the main campaign promises of the idiot who got the most votes in the last Dutch election was to put the speed limits back to 130 kmh from the reduced 100 kmh on motorways. People like to be dumb.

              BTW it would take minimal effort to enforce highway speed limits with cameras checking entry and exit times and distances. In some places with road tolls, it wouldn’t even need any more data collection. A single SQL query would return all those people doing 100 kmh over on the motorways. Wonder why outside of a few outliers, nobody does it.

              • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                51 month ago

                One big reason why mass transit is and always will be (part of) the correct answer: Don’t have to fear taking away peoples’ privelege to drive if transit it there to get them around afterward.

                • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  We are not talking about the inherent danger of driving, but the danger caused by people either physically or psychologically unfit to drive. The problem is not highways with speed limits of 130 kmh, but the people driving 240 on them, or the people driving drunk, running red lights, etc.

                  And as SUV sales show, most people are not comfortable with higher death rates for themselves, but are okay with endangering others. Ironically though, SUVs are more dangerous for their drivers as well, so apparently people are going for a perception of safety rather than actual safety even for themselves.

      • @owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        I don’t think loosening regulations in one place will help in other places.

      • @Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And if we are making rules about exiting a plane it should apply to when the plane lands normally. There is absolutely no reason it takes 30+ mints to get the fuck off the plane once we’ve arrived at the gate

        • @friendlymessage@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That would mean getting rid of carry-on and deploying emergency chutes every time which costs 10s of thousands to replace each time and grounds the plane for weeks. Makes sense.

  • @Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    631 month ago

    How people can look at (mostly) state owned rail vs private airlines and still think the free market benefits the average person is one of life’s big mysteries to me.

    • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      161 month ago

      I mean, Trump won the vote, and Brexit won the vote… Something tells me it’s as simple as most people are fucking stupid.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    481 month ago

    So I guess no putting your head between your knees in the event of a crash then, huh?

  • @nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    291 month ago

    Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you’d save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.

    • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      311 month ago

      The serious non-joke answer is the same as the one for these standing seats: emergency exit speed. When an airplane crash lands you have like less than 2 minutes to get everyone out before the huge inferno happens and roasts people. So for standing seats that pack even more people into an airplane, they have to prove that they can still get everyone out before the deadline. For laying-down seats they would have to prove the same thing.

      • @burntrealm@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        81 month ago

        Not only that, but also the mess it would make. Airlines make good money off of selling food and drinks, how are you going to consume those laying down? Very messily, that’s how. More mess = more time spent cleaning the plane = less time in the air = less ticket sales. Not to mention the loss in drink and food sales from people who don’t want to do that laying down. It’s a lose lose for the airline.

        • @zaperberry@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I would pay a premium ticket price to get a lay down seat at the back of the plane and have no food service in that zone. That gets rid of the food sales loss, for which I have never paid for anyway, as I’d be paying a higher ticket price. I guess at that point there is still a concern regarding a mess, since I can bring my own snacks, but it’s not like I would be getting some memory foam mattress with Egyptian cotton sheets with the way airlines would implement this anyway. I’d get a long pleather vinyl cushion with maybe a standard pillow.

          It would be worse than what I got in the Navy, slightly, but still better than any shit airplane seat I’ve sat in.

          • @faltryka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            51 month ago

            There is already a premium ticket price for lay down seats on large commercial passenger jets. Many of those first class seats go all the way down.

      • @qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        I’ve been on enough planes to believe 2 minutes of evacuation time will see 5% evacuated and 95% trampled before the fiery inferno.

        • TheRealKuni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          Remarkably, it has happened. People suddenly decide to pay attention to authority when they’re in a terrifying situation they’ve never experienced.

          • @qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            What I’ve chosen to glean from this is that I should inflict varied and new terrors upon coworkers to help keep us on track.

            • desktop_user [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              31 month ago

              excellent, the boss will be proud of the new performance numbers, therapy will no longer be covered by insurance to improve the sense of dread.

        • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          I hate to burst your bubble but almost no air disasters happen instantaneously. It takes many minutes to fall out of the sky. Also most air disasters still involve a mostly-controlled descent.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats?

      Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

      But it’s all shit regardless. Boeing can barely even make planes that don’t fall apart on the runway. The American airline industry’s fleet is increasingly defunct. The FAA is gutted. Airports are falling into disrepare due to mismanagement. You’ll be lucky to get any kind of air travel in another decade.

      • @Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

        Wouldn’t the same group have trouble standing for an entire flight?

        If only there was some sort of halfway point between lying down and standing up, something which would be easier to than lying down, but wouldn’t be as physically demanding as standing up.

        Oh well.

          • @Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Hmm…

            Well that’s one thing I can’t really complain about in Finland, access to physically disabled people. Its honestly pretty great, it’s been in the infra-design and all design mentality for decades.

            Anywhere there is public access, you’ll probably also find disabled access.

            Like just today, I felt a little bit proud, as I spotted an outhouse built to specifications allowing wheelchair access.

            We aren’t the utopia people seem to think we are, but if you’re in a wheelchair, you’ll still get access to nice nature paths on which to be depressed on. So that’s nice.

      • @andybytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Now, it would be pretty reactionary for me to say that you are wrong, especially when speaking about Americans or even the UK. But we are all a byproduct of our environment and I still have empathy and I don’t want a fat shame But I definitely don’t want to glorify it and I want to find the source of the problem Because people don’t necessarily choose to be overweight shit, I’m a little chunky. I’m a poor Yankee. Oh, also, very interesting, China is a capitalist country and it has an obese problem. This is all just shit on top of shit. Like, we gotta go down this rabbit hole of causation. But people don’t have the attention span. One day at a time, I suppose.

    • @CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Yeah, since this is a shit post, why don’t they wrap the passengers like a piece of luggage and store them on a shelf? Save so much room… Just give them diapers! /S

  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    291 month ago

    Honestly, that may actually be more comfortable for me than trying to fold my legs into the tiny rows they have now.

    • @turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 month ago

      I am super torn here because pre-back-surgery me looks at these and says “the NERVE of these fuckers” and post-back-surgery me is like “Well that WOULD be nice yes”

    • And if the plane fails, jump out of the plane with the chair and sit down/stand up as you’re about to hit the ground.

      You won’t receive any fall damage during the animation.

      (Make sure to check patch notes, this is a 2020 update exploit)

  • Honestly I didn’t even realize until now how good the cropping is on lemmy compared to redd*t. holy shit the number of memes that came from screenshots of twitter screenshotted on insta screenshotted on whatever the fuck but this one was profile.

  • @nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 month ago

    There’s an idea. Flights that people can make standing, should be banned, except when there is a body of water between the destination.

  • Rob T Firefly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    For what it’s worth: this was apparently a concept created by an airline seat company called Aviointeriors who showed the idea off at trade shows in 2010 (as the “SkyRider”) and 2018 (as the “SkyRider 2.0” pictured here.) Pretty much all the news articles about it are about Aviointeriors claiming vague unsourced “plans” for them to be adopted by some future date, steeped in Aviointeriors’ corporate PR speak, but the articles mostly end up being about the intense public backlash to the idea. No airlines have announced any plans to buy and use these seats, not even those lunatics at RyanAir, and in the years since all SkyRider mentions have been quietly removed from Aviointeriors’ own site.

    Sources:

    • The fact this company is still around makes me think someone with a lot of money is trying to promote the concept every so often just to see if the public might finally accept this ludicrous idea. A company being around for 15 years with 0 sales and just a concept means someone wants this to happen but thinks the only problem is that they haven’t figured out the right pitch.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I can’t wait to see people passing out or getting injured because of these seats.

    E: plenty of people arguing like people of good health will be the only passengers.

      • @jcs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        People are often advised to not lock their knees for a long time while standing (ex: marching band, or standing at attention in the military), and you cannot force anyone to have healthy posture. The ergonomics of these seats appear to take some of the load off the legs and feet, but it’s something to consider for patrons with more sedentary lifestyles. Many people believe themselves to be fit individuals until they are placed in uncomfortable conditions for a long time or experience unexpected stress. They could manage to injure themselves in some way, then find some reason to litigate.

        • @Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          Only if you do it on a regular basis, not a one-shot like this (if you do not stand a lot usually).

          Also, Turbulence!

          • @neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            apparently trombosis is a rather large problem even when flying only occasionally for vacations. That’s what I meant.

            But yeah, turbulences could give you a headache lol

        • @andybytes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          See, this is an example of Hopium. Or toxic positive optimism. Tech Bro shit. But I think you’re joking. I hope you’re joking.

        • @bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          I don’t know about how much fat it might take, but my 2 knee surgeries and both my deteriorating hip joints, (been searching eBay for a good used hip joint for cheap), tell me that standing for 2 hours is a painful idea.

          • @JulieLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They will lock in place and you will be gucci for 10 hours

            Afterwards you just ask this 6’3 bear like guy to give you a slight kick and off the ramp you slide out like a newborn out of uterus

              • @JulieLemming@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I was kicked out of the plane in any class. I don’t think this is class dependent.

                It speeds things up if you put a Burger King hat on and enact a scene out of 19th century cotton farm plantations.

                People will literally jump to fix your joints for free. Thats how much they love classic American themes

        • @andybytes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Right? And we should just take all the unfit people and just put them in camps and create a perfect society, right? Like, I get angry at America for being so fat, but not because they’re fat. I get angry at how far down the pipeline we have gone of lowest common denominator thinking. To the point where we just eat poisonous food that our body doesn’t know how to process and just stores as fat. Also, capitalism is in crisis. With lowest common denominator thinking add a little slippery slope and the power in the hands of the few with a sprinkling of toxic positive optimism with the cherry of Hopeium and now we’ve got out of touch shithead sundae. I mean, people are claustrophobic and, you know, I think the claustrophobic element makes it even worse when you’re crammed with other people. Some of the outbursts that we see on planes is not just people losing their minds, but it’s also that people are crampacked in a plane. I can see a lot more mental episodes with this type of seating Structure. And I get angry at society cheering on diminishing returns for the working class, while the billionaires are making money over hand over fist. They justify rich people to be in charge of things and to profit, but they still have yet to innovate and give us the future that they said they were going to. We’re being lied to and this is just an example of you getting dominated.

        • Talonflame (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          I’m skinny and I’ll pass out in less than an hour. Have severe POTS from EDS, heart went into asystole after 35 minutes into a tilt table test and they had to put me back down. I’ve passed out several times in other settings.